MC / EB

Elements of Course. 
The ave eh knew. 
Contrary House.
aka the gang plank.
Sea LabeLs...? [!] ?

I.Q.* (draft)

*pre-dated
Isolation
Quarantine
~~~
M O W / spring: A.  B.  Tin Foil Herman
~ : Speculative Physics

Speculative Physics

MOW + cheese

W.

Red Bull...

 I.Q. (2.0) (10-29-14)
~~~~~~~~~~~
Information
Quotient
conflation / inflation ? [!]

 

 

The Hood? ... ?

[The aves, and the aveknots or avenauts.]

Doxology

Somewhere in my reading I stumbled* upon the word: Doxology.  Not that it was used in the strictest^ sense, but it seemed to frame my model of understanding.  Not that there** is a tangent or parallel(nor aster [!]?). 

*yet to locate (1,2,4) latter inserts(5, 2, 6)
[unrelated ?]
** actually there may be !
[Huff Po ? ! ? ]

^ 1-7-14 it seemed useful in the sense it was used *** if I can find it.

*** from googled: theory of understanding (not it)


Trickle Down

 

Triadic Equations?

Good News Bad News

Not to reference a joke or peripheral* vision.

* The enlightened gift.
(FP1)

[On the other hand (dot)(dot)dot. . .***]







Nassim Nicholas Taleb **

** a caveat ?
*** inconvenient dub-you-beds. Also Note: Major Segweigh





Taleb Image

Life Imitates Chart (knot)

 

 

Bottom Line or D'Ribble:  On the Bane or Scale ?

Alternate Crossfires: Taleb v. Greenspan. 

 

[[Snowden / NSA ? !]]

 

vOO due: vCR



It's math. In progress.



I have input this date from Think Progess chart.


I won't deWonk, reWonk or futher Wonk, but it might need review.
Translation/legend:  vOO versus Original Obama(budget)
vCR versus Continuing Resolution

[My MSExcel is a rework of Think Progess chart, for thinking sake, as if a visual scan is not enough.]
[I will reviey my cell formulaes but one can alway redo that math.]

So if I may risk putting this into words:

The Senate CR is 18.04% below the Original Obama (budget) that is a compromise. The CR is 1.93% over Ryan's Budget. Is that enough to tell the story of compromise? 

But the (original)Senate Budget was a already 12.05% below OO, which is .(point)66% below the CR. Owe the irony of math and read lines (or shifting bottom lines).  The so-called compromise(CR) is $8 billion over the Senate Budget, $72 billion below the Obama Budget, and $29 billion below the Original Ryan Budget, keeping in mind the general direction of intent.  But grand math wise the Senate CR is $19 billion over Ryan's Budget which I think was compromised(reduced) $128 billion from his original, while the the Senate CR is $217 billion below Obama's Original and $199 billion below actual 2010.  Now that is leverage ... or math. 

Compromise whining aside, CALL FOR A VOTE!

NOT!

Or rather Knot Luck.
Not to pun on inherit**.
Nor kNOW*.

The House has just passed a continuing resolution that defunds Obamacare.  This heading relates to the comment Chris Matthews had on Luck.  The Senate Democrats will stand their ground, or at least pass a different bill.  The House CR will not pass the Senate, and if by some chance many people are wrong, the President will veto it.  Even if I am wrong, Chris Matthews' tack is still in play. Not the luck but the uniter and igniter of voters.   

*breaking news
** Inherit the Vote?(knot the pun ){snap?***}
(Friday the 13th Jansing&Co not there yet.)
*** (s.c.)

That is the ticket!

Up Date: The one thing? (sc) [FP1]


 

 





Hoist on our own Picard [!] (sc)
[8-2-13 FP1]

 

Curve Balls?

Pardon My Hume or Ism.

Hume: David*
Ism: humor**
Not that everything(^^)  is Pythagorean or Platonic***.

*Off the Cuff
** the trouble
***  (see * under David)
(b.s.)Hume: A., B., C., not D nor E.
(b.s.)Goliath, A. B.
(FP!) (FP1) (FP2)

[Out of^ the park? Chuck Todd pitches an interesting questions!  Press Conference^ ? Note: 2nd link ^not reflecting^ complete / answer. Follow up with MB.^^^]

(^^)


^^^ to be updated  A.  B. 

 
[ 3-21-13 To file. x, y, z     To be clear, it was after the Hume or Ism that the President hit it out of the park, but I have yet to locate his complete answer, to Chuck Todd in Israel.] 

Hump Day for Journalism

Well*... it is usually a Wednesday** but let's be preemptive !

*not a deep subject
** said relief ?


(** [!] d ? ! )



{HD}/ Iron Knee [?]?[!]
[Update: Footnotes]

11-22-12 [C-VC]

Un-Privatizing Ryan's/RawMoney.

OK, so $3.8 trillion ain't $4 trillion, but it's close enough for government work, and a Heckuva Better Job than Privatizing Ryan's/Raw Money.



Re:sources[!] [NFRY]
]...[
NPR / VC  [ ... ] /

10-15-12 M. R.

Dancing &Co

Dancing and Bernstein*** and Simon Says.
Is Roger Simon concidering a genre change?
Or has he always been so sharp? 
Unlike?(Wall Street Joe?)[Or is it Mourning Joe?]


9-28-12  Follow-up :  Sharp Unlike.
Roger Simon's parody of a mockery on the campaign trail **.  (Or cam pain?*)
Wall Street Journal agrees it is the stupid congress. 

*Tommy Christopher digs deeper. 'zzzzzzzz'
(Iron knee of sat ire read it completely.) 

**  (b.s. ). satire mockery
*** can Ohioans do math or what [!] ?
(I know percentage does not equal vote but I am employing mythmatic.  Chances of Romney win in Ohio below 4%. Yet to compare maps or 538.)   

[Bottomline:  It is not the prophets or Simon says corporate capitalizers, but it may be the Peter Paul and Mary principle.  No, just the Peter principle and robbing Paul to pay Peter.  A bird in the hand is worth not having two bushes or an etch-a-sketch Bush is more dangerous when they think they will do one^ better.] 

^ not to (fn) butt... 

Off the Cuff

Or the bottom line ?
Only the twain?

See Label
(I pun on the Mark Leder Tapes)
I know it is inarticulate, but I like his style.  He does his own warm up act, but less than 3 minutes in he frames the future as "China working with us" or "something like Europe"...

See [Fog of Math!?]
Re: Off Track

The Trouble with the Mitt:
His 47% rant is political.  
His MC hammer is off. 
Not to pun on the MC but his nail is the 96%!

There is the trouble with his charts,


trouble with his "entitles"



and trouble both domestic















 and foreign.

I may be forgetting something but I shall probably return.

Trouble with the Curve?

 

W'rithmatic and the Empty Chair.
It's Marvelous! *


Obama is 4... the 96%!

*not an endorsement


Waaaaa!!!!!  ;-): 

The Top 5%** income brackets pay 38% of total taxes collected on 35% of the nations income, while the bottom 95% pay ONLY 62% of taxes on 64% of the nations total income[!***]




** thanks to Jared Bernstein's colleagues and Citizens for Tax Justice.
*** real math is not that inciteful !

...promote the general...

Welfare(the 29th word in the Constitution).



Pre-Obama^, starker contrast.

And this is^^^ pre-Romney's Rough Road on MSNBC.
Jobs First? But not foremost.  Running from politics. 
His best defense is his cuff and hope he is phoney and fisher of men.
(I won't go there.) But the map is looking familiar. 
Fixing News(pun on breaking news): Carney(Obama "we are in this together").

Ari Melber is almost there where I haven't gotten yet. That is, what is actually taken from the paychecks of the middle class.  Payroll tax. NOW Alex Wagner is almost there.  Not only do the top 4%* get the same tax deductions and breaks as the bottom brackets(a. how many %) they get a break from the payroll tax from a second and third point. (b. over $97,500  c. capital gains ) 






[Now please take no offense at the significance of any Cretans.]

* 96% should be the Obama "entitle" R's [!]**

NOTE: Charts are being filled out here. See PAGES (right column)
NOTE: Charts of Sorts.( Tetra Heed Rons, and Wedges & Corny Copy Yeah)

** rough math but look at the right side of the second chart and see on the left that $250,000 -- and now John Sununu is doing the W'rithatic on Andrea Mitchell, but it goes to the arithmatic that is wrong -- it should be clear that the middle class is well below what Romney thinks it is and the President is for the bottom 96% well more than the 47% Romney thinks supports Obama.

^ missing link as to how I stumbled on this one (but there is a mixing of metaphors for horses and Teddy(Obama^^) Bulls. 
^^

^^^ inserted post charts et al
[Last Word ? Yeah right ! Or Left ! Re: Cycle ? R ! Not !]
[Brilliance of Democracy.]

[Strategic Pause: News Nation: No, Time is not a-side ! ]

[What the heck is the point?  It is the process and the purpose.]

Four More Years!

[ Wednesday 9-5-12 Original Post 1:27 PM]

 

 

Turn Around* ?

 

Bill Maher is to Rush Limbaugh

as Isaac Asimov is to Ayn Rand.** 

(you do the vous due)*** 

 

* C-charts

** Harry Reid

*** Bill Clinton (or the three R's)

[RawMoney, Lyin', Writhmatic.]

[Republican concedes.]^^

 

[update: 9-6-12]

Note: Update anomoly or algorythm?

 

Sandra Fluke

Elizabeth Warren

(Jansing&Co and The Place for Politics^)

(Not finished with links)

(Original labels: cartoons, charts, DNC Convention, Obamanomics)  

Newt Rock Knee ?

^ Fluke Flays Romney
^^ Bill o'check? (inconvenient aster^^^risked)
^^^ You know you are a Tea Partier if...you expect a berg'R King,

Charlotte 2012!

The DNC Convention!
Turn-around is fair play. 
Missed sarcasm: watch word.
The watch word is turn around. 
Bring it on!
The whole table.

PIG: Progress is Good!
(Not to Or well[!]...exactly)
On elements or style...


Table of Context[!](to follow)...
CAUTION though.
[Updates used to leave the original date of post intact. That changed recently.
I don't know if that is a Rovism or an AlGoreRhythm, but what the google or frack.]

[!]TOC
[take to footnotes**/under construction]
frack
google*
Rhythm
recently
though- (scroll-over)
or- exactly- table- whole- word - watch- sarcasm- fair play- around- turn- convention- DNC-

*see chart
(need other image?)
** might not

Out Foxed?

Obtuseness Redux.
Why does Social Security Need 174,000 bullets?
Dems open convention playing defense of Obama.
Get the lede out?

Not to bury any ironies or unintended puns...
The first two links are referenced in the next two lines.
The third line and two links are in regard to the heading, and to the sources.
The "Obtuseness Redux" were from Comcast/AP. 
But I first went local then tan gent or BaneOr BainOr... 
the punchline has to do with they nature of Infowars(the site), a bit more journalistic and fair and balanced than FOX, not that they do not require very careful reads.   The four links seem to represent a sort of unsorting and GPS un-crossroads dynamic. And for my part, the first aspect has to do with the irony of any whining about Social Security having an Inspector General division that hunts down fraud, in this age of second amendment fruit salad or T-parties. And for the sake of any intelligence briefs or geeks, "lede" is a journalistic term not a bullet point.  The last two links are a good un-cross Rhodes* of the left.  Not quite Tin-Foil Hats, not quite Coffee Party, but maybe close enough. (4 hard work?)

* not exactly
** ibid?
(See Labels, but I note here the original four:
DNC Convention, Infowars, Seattle PI, Social Security
(I know, [...] there is a local irony...)

[and global...]***

*** Re-verse asterisk of sorts. Emphasis on not read yet and irony. Heavy on the latter.
[For Rob Sake!]
[M-bed-ed?  Actually...]

Cut the Cow Pie!

"Open source intelligence" or We Gee Bored?
Or grow the pie?

SEGUE:
Not to pun on CP or PC, but Craven Politics?
I think we found the opposite of PC, or pie cutter. 
That's a more eh? 

My original intent was to pun or posit the opposite of PC. 
Politial Correctness, the Whine of Progress.
But it*** may be parsed* as Craven -v-  Politics.

* Romney / Obama
[Foot note or b**PS ?]
**(ad?s)  wonting to avoid gee/PS.
*** that posit

[Pardon my dimentional(and anachronistic) asterisks and acronyms, but B**ingo.]
[Note under ac"ron"yms is an anachronism. i.e. late link re: callus political calculus ]
[speaking of anachronism: just turning on Thom Hartmann with Mike Papantonio with caller on justice appointments question of obstruction and my pinnacle of politics]

[Note (2.0) The triangles are not the pie(or pi cutter), they are two dimensional, i.e. a tetrahedron.   Speaking of spell check. ]

NOTE: Charts of Sorts.